Home » Blog » Debbie Wasserman Schultz' Lukewarm Support of Three South Florida...
Blog for America
Debbie Wasserman Schultz' Lukewarm Support of Three South Florida Democrats Has Progressives Steaming Mad
Linked to groups: Democracy for America Miami-Dade (DFAM)
Please sign the petition (include your Congressional District number) to let Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz know how you feel about her unwillingness to support South Florida candidates for US House.
http://www.petitiononline.com/red2blue/petition.html
South Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (US-20) has repeatedly said that she cannot publicly support the three Democratic candidates who are running to unseat some of the worst Bush Republicans in the US House of Representatives: Mario Diaz-Balart, Lincoln Diaz-Balart, and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen.
For once there appears to be a glimmer of hope as three very viable candidates, Joe Garcia, Annette Taddeo, and Raul Martinez, have announced their campaigns to break the stranglehold that the South Florida Republicans have had for years.
What is especially galling to many mainstream Democrats who not only live in Wasserman-Schultz' Congressional District, but Democrats across the country, is that the Congresswoman holds the powerful and prestigious postion of Co-Chair of the DCCC "Red to Blue" campaign to take back House seats.
(Click Read More for the rest of this post)
Her true allegiance is now being called into question since she campaigned actively for Ron Klein in 2006 but now says that she has to work "behind the scenes" for Joe, Annette, and Raul. To further muddy the water is the Congresswoman's lock-step votes with the three Republicans to maintain not only the US embargo on Cuba, but to prevent family members who live in the US from visiting their families in Cuba. These cruel restrictions have done nothing to bring about change to a fifty year failed policy, but caused inhumane hardships as thousands of people have been denied their right to visit even in emergency situations like a death or sickness in the family. The fact that Wasserman-Schultz has received at least $22,000 in PAC money from the same group who supports the embargo seriously calls into question her capacity to be a progressive leader and her unfitness as Co-Chair.
Don't forget to sign the petition:http://www.petitiononline.com/red2blue/petition.html
Below is a letter that has been posted online and sent to the Congresswoman:
To: Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz
We appreciate your attempt at the Town Hall meeting to address our growing concerns about your support for the three local Congressional Democratic candidates in Districts 18, 21 and 25. With respect, we feel that you have totally misapprehended the nature and magnitude of this problem.
As much as you and your staff would like to think otherwise, this cannot be written off as simply a concern of the ‘left-wing blogosphere,’ and it cannot be swept under the rug as you have done with Impeachment. Your position has not only captured the attention of the mainstream media, it has now caught the attention of virtually every national and local progressive radio talk show and is generating concern and anger among progressive political groups and voters across the nation. This will not go away.
As someone who has been so respected in our community and whom we have come to know as a committed fighter for progressive causes, your position on this issue, especially in light of your prominent role in the DCCC, is puzzling and wholly untenable. The DCCC’s own website proclaims that it is “the only political committee in the country whose principal mission is to support Democratic House candidates every step of the way through this critical election year.” Your continued refusal to publicly support three extremely talented and viable Democratic candidates in your own backyard, who have a real chance of defeating three of the most right-wing, anti-progressive, pro-Bush Republicans in Congress, is damaging to all of our efforts and is totally unacceptable.
It’s unacceptable to our canvassers who are having doors in Country Walk slammed in their faces when they are asking voters to support these local candidates. It’s unacceptable to our phone bankers in Hialeah who are having Democratic voters hang up on them when they ask for donations to these campaigns. It’s unacceptable to our precinct organizers who are struggling to find volunteers – because their fellow Democrats have read in the paper that “two influential members of Congress [have] said they would not support the three because of long-standing personal and professional relationships with the Republican incumbents.”
We are working for the same cause and are trying to be on your side, but you are making our jobs impossible. Your insistence that you can support these candidates ‘behind the scenes,’ but ‘not publicly’ contradicts your role as the Co-Chair of the Red-to-Blue campaign. You cannot dichotomize support – either it is wholehearted or it is half-hearted, and, believe us, the voters, the political observers and the commentators, are keenly aware of the difference.
As co-chair of Red-to-Blue, as a Democratic Congressperson who in her Town Hall meetings decries and makes great political hay out of the damage created by the Bush Administration, how can you not publicly support the opponents of three Republicans who have consistently voted in lock-step with this President? Can you not see the blatant inconsistency in your position? Once again, we can assure you, the voters do.
Leaders can’t pick and choose when they will lead. They have to be ready to lead at all times and at all costs. That’s part of the job. If you are going to be co-chair of Red-to-Blue you need to be able to publicly contrast the candidates as you did for Ron Klein against Clay Shaw and your support must be unequivocal and unwavering. If you cannot do this publicly, then step down as chair and let someone who is unencumbered by allegiances and friendships fulfill the duties this position entails.
Only you can fix this. As quickly as this blew up and spread across the country, it can be rectified – by you. It cannot, as your aide suggested, be fixed by us. You can stand up as you have in the past. Take the spot light off yourself and put it back on the candidates. The nation is watching Congresswoman. Please do the right thing for South Florida, for the DCCC and the country.
Thank you for all your hard work. We look forward to hearing from you on this matter and sincerely look forward to working with you to elect Democrats to office and reclaim the Congress and White House.
He certainly is.
I find myself wholly in agreement with James Carville this morning who, speaking of Bill Richardson, said he wanted Richardson's acto to be remembered for what it was and that it will be.
I want Carville's statements about Dean to be remembered for what they are: that Dean should be removed as the party chair, that money was misspent in pursuit of the 50 state strategy, that candidate Dean had "mad mouth" disease, that we were actually safer in this country following the capture of Saddam.
Get a real bead on what a beltway Judas Carville really is from this segment of an editorial in the Nation in November 2006:
"On the day after the [2006] election, Clintonistas-in-Waiting awoke to realize their wing of the party is not represented at the top of the party. For them, it seems, restoration of a Clinton White House--getting Senator Hillary Clinton nominated in 2008--needs inside influence. . . So why not take a shot at Dean and see what happens? Senator Clinton issued a limp disavowal, but if her side wants to start a fight, she can't have it both ways.
"To get the hypocrisy, remember that Carville and Greenberg came to fame with Bill Clinton's 1992 'Putting People First' victory. The new President promptly turned right, and his White House eviscerated the DNC's promising coordination of state party campaigns. Clinton politics was all about him. Eight years later, Democrats had lost it all: White House, Senate, House.
"In contrast, Dean got a lot of flak when he remarked that Democrats should start talking to everyone, including people in deeply red states. He made the same pitch when he ran for DNC chair in 2005 against the establishment and won.
"Surprise--Dean has actually done what he promised. He gets funds to states, with the result that Democrats are speaking directly again to people in red areas, including through ads on Christian-right radio. This is politics for the long term. Nobody expects early conversion in Mississippi. But less than two years after Dean's launch, Democrats won control of the House and Senate for the first time since the Clinton team lost it in 1994."
Tom wrote:
"But less than two years after Dean's launch, Democrats won control of the House and Senate for the first time since the Clinton team lost it in 1994."
And guess what? DLC clowns like Wasserman-Schultz and the Clintons are doing their best to ensure that the Democrats lose both houses and the presidency next fall.
11:26 am
McCain is playing fast and loose with the truth, and gaining traction for his lies.
Why?
Because the Democrats can't summon the courage to go after him, even with 70% of Americans wanting out of Iraq.
11:31am
my lap-top has been erratic, but here's an updated story on Debbie
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/25/103655/689/788/482289
perhaps Debbie needs to be primaried.
Actually, if you consider that the Republican party has been taken over by people who haven't a clue about how to do the people's work, then re-invigorating the Democratic party isn't a matter of politics, it's a matter of national survival.
We should know by now that a civilization can collapse within one generation
HOW SICK ARE THE CLINTONS?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sherman-yellen/question-why-is_b_93260.html
The Clintons have suggested that among the candidates only Hillary and McCain are qualified to be president and make the crucial decisions because of their great experience, thereby casting doubt on Barack Obama's judgment. It's an amazing way to help their party reach the White House; more amazing after what McCain once said of Hillary and their young daughter, Chelsea, during the Clinton White House years when Chelsea was a child.
Addressing an audience of like-minded, foul-mouthed Republican politicos, McCain told the joke that most MSM have been reluctant to report. "Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly?" McCain quipped. "Because her father in Janet Reno!" he replied. As his audience roared with laughter McCain had succeeded in calling the kid a freak and her mom a lesbian. Nice man.
11:37AM
Monica wrote:
re-invigorating the Democratic party isn't a matter of politics, it's a matter of national survival.
As sick as the Democratic party is, it would be better for the country to euthanize it and start from scratch with a new, vigorous progressive party.
The Democrats are in a death spiral.........
11:41am
ok, the wrap function still gets trumped by a hard return. The comment box gets a horizontal scroll bar, much as it gets a vertical scroll bar when a post gets too long for the box, but the horizontal line just keeps on going and the text doesn't transfer when the comment is submitted. This seems to be a coding problem in the length of the line which is somehow negated by a hard return. maybe the code is in the wrong sequence.
So, i'm on the bottom again. LOL
In Dean We Trust by clammyc
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3...
John is quoting the Nation, not me. However, I wouldn't want any impatience with the progress that Democrats are making as a majority party in Congress to somehow reflect on my complete support for Dean's 50 state strategy and the other work he has done to bolster the electoral success of the party since he became chair.
John wrote "As sick as the Democratic party is, it would be better for the country to euthanize it and start from scratch with a new, vigorous progressive party."
I categorically disagree with every word of this suicide pact with third party progressives.
yes, when hillary finally drops out - and you wouldn't even know it as Bill was on the TV this a.m. talking about florida and michigan - we can just see the smile on howard's face.
To take down the clintons and the carville's is enough to make one cry.
And they are going down folks.
Don't let the news that even bayh endorsed her today. He endorsed her months ago.
Try to find something nice to say, Hillary.
Monica
The platform position in Iowa is Right to Know, and labeling, labeling, labeling and consumer choice.
country of origin, certified organic, milk from cows rBST free(like mine), irradiated, ultra pasteurized, nutritional content?
let the consumers choose
I can't understand the Congress making a big deal about Barry Bonds and then protecting Monsanto and their profits by approving the use of similar substances in cows
my cows work hard enough as it is without jacking them up
Swiss Valley milk from all my fellow cooperator producers is from cows certified by a signed affidavit to be from cows rBST free, even if the analog BST does occur naturally, We do market through WalMart along with every other store brand in the area as well but don't label our milk about BST, just do because some handlers demand it and we don't want to segregate the milk, but if allowed probably would make a statement about BST on the label
I've often told Presidential candidates that ask what I do for a living, that if they understand how federal milk marketing orders work, I would be scared what other knowledge they have left out that is probably more important to keep in their head, it is pretty archane stuff
12.
Monica Smith
Tue, 03/25/08
...re-invigorating the Democratic party isn't a matter of politics, it's a matter of national survival.
We should know by now that a civilization can collapse within one generation...
-------
Wow, Monica, confusion must of been running really deep...lol.
a) America is not civilization, at least not yet. Therefore national survival civilization survival;
b) civilization have managed to survive much tougher tests than some Party's collapse
HOLD ON TO YOUR HATES FOLKS, THE FAT LADY IS READY TO SING!!!
Rasmussen: Within 10 in PA!
by MikeMinCT [Subscribe] Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 08:12:30 AM PDTClinton 49, Obama 39. Obama with higher favorability among Democratic voters. Only 38% care about the Wright comments, less among undecideds.
- MikeMinCT's diary :: ::
If this poll is an accurate snapshot, Obama is within striking distance to put her away, and his upcoming bus tour through the state could move him within a comfortable 6-8 point margin in which she would likely have to drop out immediately after PA.
It's time for PocketNines to come in and do a thorough analysis of the demography and the new voter data.
Everyone MUST work at winning PA. Set the bar high and ignore the wiggle room!
12.
former
Tue, 03/25/08
oops:
national survival civilization survival;
s/b national survival is not equal to civilization survival;
b) civilization have managed to survive much tougher tests than some Party's collapse
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
habeus corpus would be one of my tests for civilization
torture?
rule of law?
working markets?
Barack Obama's campaign
In February alone, more than 94% of our donors gave in amounts of $200 or less. Meanwhile, campaign finance reports show that donations of $200 or less make up just 13% of Senator McCain's total campaign funds, and only 26% of Senator Clinton's.
https://donate.barackobama.com/dinner
This movement is changing the way campaigns are funded.
Ha ha. The following comes from Hillary Clinton for President Chairman, Terry McAuliffe's letter to supporters:
"Here is just a small sample of the words they have used to describe Hillary and her campaign: 'disingenuous,' 'divisive,' 'untruthful,' 'dishonest,' and much more."
You mean Clinton did duck her head to avoid sniper fire during a trip to the Tuzla Air Force Base in Bosnia in 1996? No? Oh, she misspoke. Then obviously none of those adjectives apply to her, but as for McAuliffe, who would disagree with the characterization?
MSNBC reporting that Obama is up by 21 in NC and Rasmussen has him within ten in PA. I know, polls don't mean much...
I have never been too concerned about any ofthe extraneous issues in the Obama - Clinton tussle. I still feel that the delegates-at-large ( I prefer this to superdelegates ) will follow the example of the voters. I know that Clinton needs well over 60% average in the remaining ten primaries. I knew that Barack Obama expected that Reverend Wright would find his way into the campaign eventually - and would deal with it effectively when that moment occured.
When I campaigned for Obama in Pennsylvania on Friday, I was particularly impressed by the take-everything-in-stride attitude of his campaign. He trusts the voters as do they. None of them feel the need to be managed by the campaign - let alone micromanaged ( a la Clinton campaign style ).
If anyone here is worried about Obama's ultimate victory, I would suggest you channel that angst into a day or two in Pennsylvania. That effort on your part will benefit you by allaying your fears. It will also benefit a very fine campaign and a very fine candidate.
I will be back in Pennsylvania before April 22nd.
And, as always . . . . . . .
If George W. Bush made an assertion comparable to Senator Clinton's about her experience in Bosnia, we would be calling him a liar.
The fact that we have not called Senator Clinton a liar speaks well of our treatment of her. She should remember that well during Senator Obama's general election campaign.
On the subject of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz . . . . . . we can tolerate her for now and then primary her later.
seashell :-)
Tue, 03/25/08
Reply to this
"We are living through another Hiroshima," Iraqi doctor says by Sherwood Ross | March 24, 2008 - 8:41am | permalink
article tools: email | print | read more Sherwood Ross
The U.S., Great Britain and Israel are turning portions of the Middle East into a slice of radioactive hell. They are achieving this by firing what they call "depleted uranium" (DU) ammunition but which is, in fact, radioactive ammunition and it is perhaps the deadliest kind of tactical ammo ever devised in the warped mind of man
==========================================
Great article, seashell, sent a letter to the Obama campaign, asking him to address the issue
MSNBC reporting that Obama is up by 21 in NC
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
you se..you see mary.......it worked! rollerblading around town wit my new Obama Halloween mask is the differnace!
Hey Michael, do you have a pix of you in the obama mask.
who is running the show??
U.S. says missile parts mistakenly sent to Taiwan- Story Highlights
- Non-nuclear ballistic missile components sent to Taiwan, Pentagon says
- Taiwan had requested radio batteries
- U.S. military has retrieved missile parts from Taiwan; probe is under way
- U.S. notifies China, which considers Taiwan to be a renegade province
- Next Article in U.S. »
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The U.S. Defense Department accidentally shipped non-nuclear ballistic missile components to Taiwan, the Pentagon said Tuesday.
A U.S. Defense Department image of the missile components it says were accidentally shipped to Taiwan.
Four nose-cone fuses for intercontinental ballistic missiles were shipped instead of helicopter batteries that Taiwan had requested, Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne said.
The fuses were shipped to Taiwan in the fall of 2006 and kept in a warehouse there. The Taiwanese military informed the United States last week about their presence on the island.
"There are no nuclear or fissile materials associated with these items," Wynne said. "The United States is making all appropriate notifications in the spirit of candor and openness in an effort to avoid any misunderstanding."
An investigation is under way, he added.
vb wrote "MSNBC reporting that Obama is up by 21 in NC and Rasmussen has him within ten in PA."
I'm ultimately skeptical how helpful these polls results are. Linda wrote this comment on her own diary at myDD:
"Oh, I see, you want to close your eyes to reality. It's ok, just do the healing thing offline, oK? Hillary has over taken her lead as the polls show. Hillary has grown her lead in PA. Hillary is now 1 pt up on Obama in North Carolina. And looking very good for Indiana and South Carolina. So, again, facts paint a different picture."
1:48 PM EST
hmhhh, the gall of it all:
How dare you?
Jordan DuboisIssue date: 3/25/08 Section: Opinions...How dare you try to move people with the spoken word! Who do you think you are? You ought to be ashamed of yourself, making everybody feel so optimistic about politics and their country!...How dare you attend an all African-American church whose pastor has fairly radical views! Me? Oh, well my all-white Southern Baptist church is extremely accepting. Just no homosexuals please. Or pro-choice folks. But everyone else is welcome. And I always agree one hundred percent with the ideas of my pastor. I mean, who doesn't? Thinking for yourself is overrated anyway.
...How dare you be so young and inexperienced! C'mon, only the most politically experienced presidents like Nixon and Buchanan do well. And then look at the ones without much political experience like Washington and that Lincoln guy. I think it is obvious that experience is the key to success as a president.
How dare you claim to be in touch with the American people! Just because you were born to a middle-class family, because you barely knew your father after your parents divorced, and because you worked your way up the social and economic ladder, doesn't necessarily mean that you are more in touch with normal Americans than the other candidates. How dare you know so much about sports and other normal things! Sportsmanship, competition, and teamwork, three traits that are not even slightly important in politics!
How dare you try to win this election by giving hope to the disenfranchised! That generation of voters from 2000 who feel cheated, they don't really even count. And all those college students this year who support you, what do they know? The future of politics in our nation is interest groups and old people. We have no use for these younger generations....
Jo, yes I remember the offensive post. Was it directed at you by name? Then yes, it should have been deleted.
The other posts, however, didn't seem ugly; but revealing another's home town is not nice. That's what I remember the most since it happened to me.
All this talk about BO being the most progressive. I think it was determined long ago that HC is slightly more so. But never mind.
Huron is spot on. Or was it one of my articles? We have three corporate candidates and the wars will continue as we here decline. So pick the corporate candidate that you want to have tea with, or whose spouse you like, or sounds prettiest in speeches or is less shrill.
Has HC said anything lately about going into Afghan to "win the war?" (BO has) If so, please post it. Has she said she'll go into Pakistan uninvited if she has "actionable intel?" (BO has) Please post that. I can't find anything.
See, I want a prez who is LEAST likely to invade and kill and maim more people. McC is MOST likely IMO. And then...well....I don't like BO's war talk and HC is not war talking at present.
That said,
Nobody for President.
For me, it's now all about the war and more killing and who is going to respect life more....BO or HC? A man or a woman? Historically, women are the nurturers, men the warriors.
**********************************
Jo, of course you belong here. I prolly don't. :-) And that's why I'm withdrawing slowly. There are people here who have to be right all the time. Pity.
Great article, seashell, sent a letter to the Obama campaign, asking him to address the issue"
Fred, he may talk about it, but will he DO anything about it? I doubt that he'll stand up to Israel. And talk is cheap.
**************************
Pat, I don't support BO or any of them becuz I think their foreign policies are MOTS. Don't you think that's a good enuf reason? I'm very very VERY anti-war!!!
seashell wrote "revealing another's home town is not nice. That's what I remember the most since it happened to me."
Fred, did you hear about this?
If George W. Bush made an assertion comparable to Senator Clinton's about her experience in Bosnia, we would be calling him a liar
It took years to get to that point of calling Bush the liast he has always been. There were so many "misspokens" as well as dozens of other equivalent words meaning lies by the media which gave him a free pass for too many years.
We can only hope that Clinton's "misspokens" don't take long to be called the lies that they are.
My feel is that the media is already toying with the idea since the now-widely used lie word has much precedence and would make them feel secure in using it against Clinton as well as GWB.
I don't know, sea. Certainly everybody wants their mother to be nurturant. And everybody wants to assume that's what nature intended. But, considering that human infants, instead of being able to stand on their own legs and suckle from a mother that hold still, as many mamals do, are born being able to make a lot of noise to signal their distress at being ignored and hungry, I'm inclined to conclude that humans are not naturally inclined to be nurturing parents and that it's often up to someone else to provide the necessary nutrition. Human infants are quite ready to survive without the birth mother. This suggests that nurture is not automatic and, in many instances, has to be demanded. That is, the infants that make the most noise are the most likely to survive. And that, of course, promotes speech.
Michael, you rollerblading at your age?? Go for it!
However, Obama was up 25 points in NC several months ago. But polls have a way of flattening out to reality so I'm sure Obama will settle for 21. That is, if you believe polls.
I'm very very VERY anti-war!!!
sea,
I expect most of us are very, very, very anit-war!!! I have since before the war. That's what led me to Howard.
CBS News report, March 24, 2008.
UPDATE Monday 8:50 P.M.
As has now been conclusively established by video film and news photographs, Hillary Clinton did NOT come under sniper fire in Bosnia in March 1996 when she made a morale-boosting visit to U.S. troops enforcing the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement. But she is taking plenty of bullets for her over-dramatic accounts of the trip, and acknowledged on Monday that she had made a "misstatement." She said it should be treated as a "minor blip."
Here is her full statement, in reply to questions from the Philadelphia Daily News:
Now let me tell you what I can
2:08 PM EDT
fessing up time, is now:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-campaign26mar26,1,167030.story?track=rss
Obama campaign posts his tax returns on WebBy Michael Muskal, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer10:51 AM PDT, March 25, 2008 The campaign of Sen. Barack Obama today posted his tax returns on its website, a move designed to pressure Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton to release her financial information.
The campaigns have sparred over tax and financial information before. For the Obama campaign, the issue is part of its effort to portray the New York senator as hiding key information or in some case exaggerating it. ...Obama's tax returns from 2000 to 2006 were posted this morning, the campaign announced. Much of the information had been previously released to news organizations.
...The tax issue came up in Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign, but in a different way. Republican candidate Rick Lazio was followed by a protester who called himself Tax Man, demanding that Lazio makes his documents public.
The Clinton campaign used the issue to embarrass Lazio.
...
What I suspect is that Clinton was/is conflicted about Bosnia/Kosovo, wanting to talk about her experiences in a place where Bill authorized a gigantic military base with missile and radar installations and not wanting to reveal classified information. Beside, given the recent effort to declare Kosovo an independent state, it probably seemed doubly important to reference her familiarity with the place. Remember this place? That picture was taken in 2000.
i don't know why it displays like that. you can see it better here
http://hannah.smith-family.com/?s=Camp+Bondsteel
It is so difficult for me to find Debbie Wasserman-Schultz has taken on this position at this point in her career.
When she and Kendrick Meek, both Reps from So. Fla (who supported Clinton), had their little sideshows on C-Span at night after a day's House session, they attacked GWB very hard and called the Republicans "rubber-stampers." Meek had a huge rubber stamp about a foot long he would often drag out. Debbie had a little wooden guy with a bobbing head which she called the "Yes" guy which was ultimately stolen one dark night.
So what has happened that the come of the worst of the very people Debbie attacked are now people she will not even campaign against? Mind boggling.
It's really sad. I hate to see someone fail.
Considering that I was born in 1941 and spent my first few months in bunkers every night and still can't hear the sound of a siren without getting an uncomfortable rush of adrenaline, I don't think there's anyone more anti-war here than I. At the same time, I recognize that there are evil people who delight in the corruption and destruction of other people and such people have to be stopped. What's distressing is that this time such evil people are sitting in the chambers of the U.S. government. Which means that no place on earth is immune from the potential of evil getting a foot-hold.
Evil often arrives under the guise of good intentions. Which is probably why Jesus said, "by their deeds ye shall know them."
Why does it always have to be a problem coming out of Florida?
James Carville is married to Mary Matalin. They are parents. What does that tell you? He is not/was not/and never will be a real Progressive. Period.
The American people are coming out to vote; they're angry, and very worried. A lot are scared now because of the economy. Novemer is going to be very hard for any corporate fascist group to steal/throw an election. Even here in Florida where all crooks come to live
Add your comment
(to reply directly to a comment, click the reply icon for that comment)Post closed to commenting
 |
|
 |
My DFA |
|
Members |
|
Groups |
|
Events |
|
Candidates |
 |
|
Blog for America
-
Still Waiting
By Dave Santucci on Dec 1, 2008 4:49 PM EST -
Death at Wal-Mart--True Meaning of the Holidays
By Thomas Janowski on Nov 29, 2008 8:00 AM EST -
My better nature coming through
By Jack Bucci on Nov 26, 2008 10:21 AM EST -
Action Alerts
By Kenneth Quinnell on Nov 23, 2008 2:20 PM EST -
The Cheney Legacy:
By Jeff Morris-Saugerties, N.Y.- De on Nov 22, 2008 1:40 AM EST
Recent Blog Posts
-
On Traffic Checkpoints, Part One, Or, Freedom? That's So...Inefficient
By fake consultant on Dec 1, 2008 9:44 PM EST -
Still Waiting
By Dave Santucci on Dec 1, 2008 4:49 PM EST -
Wal-Mart danger a DANGER ZONE
By Gloria L on Dec 1, 2008 1:45 PM EST -
Monday articles
By Gerry L on Dec 1, 2008 8:12 AM EST -
Bob Gulack's Letter to the Editor
By Paul Eisenman on Nov 30, 2008 1:23 PM EST
-
By Phil Specht on Mar 24, 2008 7:29 PM EDTHoward Dean is first.