Home » Blog » Our Convention, Our Time

Blog for America

Our Convention, Our Time

Written by: Kevin Shaw on Feb 21, 2008 9:53 AM EST

Linked to groups: PA for Democracy

In this critical year, Take Back America will bring together all of the tribes of the progressive movement—grassroots and netroots activists, elected officials, business owners, policy experts and more. Together, we will generate new power for our movement for change based on a new vision and bold ideas for an America that works for everyone, not just the few.

Click here to register

Driving the Debate in 2008 and Beyond

Five themes at the heart of the progressive agenda will be the focus of Take Back America 2008:

  • Economic Strategy for America in the Global Economy
  • Green Jobs for a Sustainable Energy Future
  • Quality, Affordable Health Care for All
  • Out of Iraq to Real Security
  • The New Social Justice Agenda

Who’s Coming to Take Back America 2008?

Dozens of progressive leaders are scheduled to appear at Take Back America 2008. They include:

Tom Andrews*
Andrea Batista-Schlesinger
Jared Bernstein
Deepak Bhargava
Chris Bowers
David Brock*
Leslie Cagan
Majora Carter
Joseph Cirincione
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton*
Chuck Collins
Digby
John Edwards*
Rep. Keith Ellison*
Leo Gerard
Danny Glover*
Robert Greenwald
John Halpin
Jane Hamsher
Van Jones
Naomi Klein
Robert Kuttner
Celinda Lake
Norman Lear
Mary Beth Maxwell
Al Meyerhoff
Karen Nussbaum*
Sen. Barack Obama*
Eli Pariser
Rick Perlstein
Carl Pope*
Gov. Ed Rendell*
Cecile Richards*
Joel Rogers
Rep. Jan Schakowsky
Gov. Brian Schweitzer*
Krysten Sinema
David Sirota
Ron Stief
John Sweeney*
Gloria Totten
Jim Wallis*
Drew Westen
(*invited)
Check back for updates to this list. We’ve invited a cross-section of people at the forefront of the progressive movement.

Tags:

Discuss
 

Show: Expand All Reply

+0 Rating
59t13927

-

By Denise in San Mateo County on Feb 21, 2008 12:08 PM EST

Howard is first!

Hope there is a valid reason why he can't be at TBA. Maybe it has something to do with this being an election year, ya think? :)

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Joan* In*Florida on Feb 21, 2008 1:02 PM EST

Hi Denise

Barack Obama won the Democrats Abroad global primary in results announced today, giving him 11 straight victories in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/politics/bal-obamaabroad0221,0,1970988.story

+0 Rating
357t234709

-

By * rdorgan on Feb 21, 2008 12:16 PM EST

12:24 PM EST

http://www.katc.com/global/story.asp?s=7905041

Change to Win labor federation to endorse Barack Obama for president

Associated Press - February 21, 2008 12:13 PM ET

WASHINGTON (AP) - Barack Obama is gaining yet more support from organized labor today.

A union official tells The Associated Press that the new Change to Win labor federation will give its first presidential endorsement to Obama. The 6-million member federation is made up of 7 unions, 4 of which have already endorsed the Illinois senator -- including the Teamsters.

...

It's not immediately known what the endorsement means for the United Farm Workers. They are part of Change to Win and have endorsed Hillary Rodham Clinton. It is also unclear what it means for the federation's two uncommitted unions, the Laborers' International Union and the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners, which had endorsed John Edwards.

The unions in the Change to Win federation broke from the AFL-CIO three years ago.

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Feb 21, 2008 1:07 PM EST

"A strategy of doing nothing and letting globalization run its course won't result in the imminent collapse of the American economy." .... "But over the long term doing nothing probably means an America very different from the one most of us grew up in. It will mean a nation more stratified economically and socially" ... "It will mean an America in which we continue to mortgage our assets to foreign leaders" .... "an America in which we underinvest in basic scientific research" ... "an America that's more politically polarized " ... "Worst of all it will mean fewer opportunities for younger Americans, a decline in the upward mobility that's been at the heart of this country's promise since it's founding." Barack Obama

The Audacity of Hope  Random House New York 2006 p148,149

+0 Rating
Rodeo2_tinythumb

-

By Darrell in Iowa on Feb 21, 2008 1:07 PM EST

Well thank you for the all nice remarks welcoming be back, although I am uncertain about tieing my name in with Bobby O....arrghhh

 So the Iraqi plane remains on the ground well guarded with no people or photographers allowed near it.  I am living in my RV less then a couple miles away.  On the noon news the story from the government changed once again and they have refused to say who was flying the plane.

People here who talked to the pilot and passengers said they were Iraqi.  The Department of Defense says they were US Citizens.  People here were told the plane was brought to the US for repairs.  I can't imagine why it would be brought here for simple repairs...there's more to this then what the government is telling.

 And I am still bothered that this plane crashed landed about thirty minutes before the two US Air Force jets were reported missing and eventually reported crashed.

 All of it coincidence....maybe...but maybe not

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Feb 21, 2008 1:11 PM EST

 "we have to fight them there or we will have to fight them here" lol

+0 Rating
59t13927

-

By Denise in San Mateo County on Feb 21, 2008 12:25 PM EST

Hi Joan! Bet you're enjoying some nice weather. Still cool and a bit rainy here, but the clouds didn't diminish last night's eclipse too badly.

Just breezing in and out between appts today. We have a visit from a vendor who is bringing lunch so it was worth coming in today. LOL

Pat, got your comment last thread about Pago Pago. It is so cool, all of the places you have lived. When I think of Pago Pago, I think of an old restaurant in downtown Chicago where we used to go to lunch for Polynesian food (cheap!). "One of those days" usually turned into a shout across the office "Pago Pago!"

s m, glad you are safe.

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Joan* In*Florida on Feb 21, 2008 1:12 PM EST

I hate this old McCain old rumor story. In addition to the suspicious timing, it has become another diversion for the media and their ever-present bottom line.

It may also be their excuse not to cover the Democrats' primary. Or be used as an excuse when they lose the general election. Could also be I am a conspiracy theorist:))

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By FRED from OR on Feb 21, 2008 12:29 PM EST

Democrats to face off in must-win state for Clinton

Sens. Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois will face off in a Democratic presidential debate in Austin Thursday.

The debate, to be held on the campus of the University of Texas, will air live on CNN, CNN International and CNN.com from 8 to 9:30 p.m. ET. The debate will also air in Spanish on Univision at 11:30 p.m. ET.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/21/t...

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Feb 21, 2008 1:17 PM EST
Click here to visit our new Web 2.0 Widget page today!

Here's a quick overview of our newest Web 2.0 widgets:

Cozmo Video Player: Our new Cozmo widget allows you to easily watch different video clips we've posted, including a clip of Al Gore and me at an event together, my speech on global warming at the National Press Club, and a CNN news segment where I talk about climate change with Wolf Blitzer.  You can even embed our Cozmo widget on your own website, where new videos will be posted automatically as we publish them!

Eventful: Through our Eventful widget, you can vote for me to visit your city for an event.  As campaign season heats up, and as the Senate schedule allows, I'll do my best to schedule a visit.  So be sure to vote for your city, and invite other friends to participate as well!

Bridgit: With our Bridgit widget, you can easily "bridge" yourself to my Facebook profile, MySpace page, and a host of other online communities that I'm now a part of. I'm hoping that you'll "friend" me on one or more of these sites that you frequent -- and if you ever forget how to get to one of my online profiles, you can always visit my Bridgit page to "bridge" yourself again.

Invite me to visit your town, watch a few videos, or "bridge" yourself to one of my online social networking profiles.  Click here to visit our Web 2.0 Widget page today!

In addition to posting these widgets on the BarbaraBoxer.com website, we've also provided the HTML code for each so that you can easily embed your favorite widgets on your own blog or MySpace page.

These new widgets are a great way to communicate with each other, to show your support for my work, and to invite new people to join our Barbara Boxer.com online community too.  So I hope you’ll check them out!

Help us build our BarbaraBoxer.com online community across MySpace, Facebook, and the blogosphere. Click here to visit our Web 2.0 Widget page now!

Thank you so much for your continued support.  I hope you enjoy these new Web 2.0 widgets!

In Friendship,

Barbara Boxer
U.S. Senator

P.S.  If you're not familiar with these new Web 2.0 widgets, don't worry:  Take it from this grandmother, they're really fun and easy to use!  I hope you'll take just a minute to click over and check out our new widgets.  I think you'll like what you see

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By FRED from OR on Feb 21, 2008 12:32 PM EST

.

Phil Specht
Thu, 02/21/08

Reply to this
"we have to fight them there or we will have to fight them here" lol
==================

really? Seriously folks, we have to fight them in Sweden, which took 30,000 Iraqi refugees. The USA has taken about 150 refugees, so far.

+0 Rating
Dean_tinythumb

-

By Sitka on Feb 21, 2008 12:30 PM EST

I hate this old McCain old rumor story.

When the Party of Morality decided to dish it out, they should have known they'd have to take it too. 

But the real story is as old as the Keating Five -- McCain selling his office yet again. Whether it was for money or sex makes little difference. 

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Feb 21, 2008 1:21 PM EST

just as long as it wasn't a black helicopter with UN markings Darrell

+0 Rating
167t236061

-

By floridagal . on Feb 21, 2008 12:38 PM EST

Hope Howard Dean is invited to TBA.  One year he wasn't.   I thought that was odd. 

More on the evolution "controversy" in Florida.  It is really embarrassing. 

 Florida "placates" the religious right by adding the word "theory" on the final evolution vote.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/1843

There is article after article in the state about how the creationist/intelligent design folks won this round.    They got even playing field for their religious views.  

"The most vocal board members before the vote were Roberto Martinez, a Coral Gables attorney, and Donna Callaway, a retired Tallahassee principal. Both voted "No" -- but for very different reasons. Martinez wanted the standards adopted as written by the experts asked to devise them. He noted the National Academy of Sciences gave its approval to the original version. He said the last-minute option was diluted one created to "placate those people who had concerns about the evolution standards."

+0 Rating
Rodeo2_tinythumb

-

By Darrell in Iowa on Feb 21, 2008 12:39 PM EST

funny you should write that........there's a helicopter overhead right now

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By linda b on Feb 21, 2008 12:37 PM EST

Wow. thank you for DFA being at the TBA conference this year. I hope they will be a sponsor.

One thing - host a table. Not just of volunteers, but for info. I know Kesh at DC for Democracy will help.

I can't be there for all three days. They moved the date up this year. Used to be in June.

But again, thanks DFA for being there. It is important.

Now how bout some training down here.

+0 Rating
676t107993

-

By Tom Bearse on Feb 21, 2008 1:27 PM EST

Joan wrote "I hate this old McCain old rumor story."

What I like is seeing the circuits of conservatives smoking because now they have the so-called liberal bogeyman of the Times and other media, supposedly deep-sixing the campaign of the so-called straight-talking and liberal leaning John McCain, and are unable to rail against both at once without looking foolish even to themselves.  They're impaled on the horns of a dilemma.

+0 Rating
Rodeo2_tinythumb

-

By Darrell in Iowa on Feb 21, 2008 12:41 PM EST

funny you should say that, there's is a helicopter flying overhead right now

+0 Rating
511t233735

-

By Huron John on Feb 21, 2008 12:43 PM EST

Time and Sequence Check

12:46pm

Don't bury me.......on the lone praireee

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By FRED from OR on Feb 21, 2008 12:43 PM EST

Obama Wins the Democrats Abroad Primary

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Barack Obama won the Democrats Abroad global primary in results announced Thursday, giving him 11 straight victories in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination.

...More than 20,000 U.S. citizens living abroad voted in the primary, which ran from Feb. 5 to Feb. 12. Obama won about 65 percent of the vote, according to the results released Thursday.

Voters living in 164 countries cast votes online, while expatriates voted in person in more than 30 countries, at hotels in Australia and Costa Rica, at a pub in Ireland and at a Starbucks in Thailand. The results took about a week to tabulate as local committees around the globe gathered ballots.

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community...

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Joan* In*Florida on Feb 21, 2008 1:31 PM EST

I don't watch debates much, they all seem so prepared by and for the media to manipulate an election.

But I do wish they would quit pushing Clinton and ask this one big question of Hillary Clinton which apparently never gets asked of her:

What experience do you have to be president?

Her "experience" is limited to her years in the U S Senate -- far less than that of BO. If Clinton tries to include eight years as first lady, she should be called to task for that. First lady is hardly experience except for keeping the WH clean and neat and controlling the help there.

Then they can ask Barack Obama the same question so viewers can compare and see for themselves.

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Feb 21, 2008 1:34 PM EST

look over your shoulder for your last post Darrell they don't show up at the bottom and keeep changing number and order

the dollar is going to lose half it's value from it's high against the Euro when that currency hit its low

globalization depends on a reserve currency so not to worry about a new world order Daniel

more like a new world monopoly game with play money

+0 Rating
Dean_tinythumb

-

By Sitka on Feb 21, 2008 12:46 PM EST

"A strategy of doing nothing and letting globalization run its course won't result in the imminent collapse of the American economy." .... "But over the long term doing nothing probably means an America very different from the one most of us grew up in. It will mean a nation more stratified economically and socially" ... "It will mean an America in which we continue to mortgage our assets to foreign leaders" .... "an America in which we underinvest in basic scientific research" ... "an America that's more politically polarized " ... "Worst of all it will mean fewer opportunities for younger Americans, a decline in the upward mobility that's been at the heart of this country's promise since it's founding." Barack Obama

Compare that to this piece of trash editing posted by LindaNM yesterday........ 

2. Linda in NM<> -- Obama, "I believe in Free Trade"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTfJmz3GW...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Here's what Obama said in the video, which is from NH..... 

"In one day we have a chance to restore balance to our economy. I believe in the free market. I believe in capitalism. I believe in free trade. I am not worried about us being able to compete with anyone in the world with American workers....."

Then the video cuts abruptly. From the inflections in his speech, it's obvious that his next word was, "But..."

Only it wouldn't  have served the shameful purpose of deception to allow anyone to see it.

 

 

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Feb 21, 2008 1:36 PM EST

well we did find out what the "special" means in special Interest lobbyist to McCain

+0 Rating
Dean_tinythumb

-

By Sitka on Feb 21, 2008 12:55 PM EST

the so-called liberal bogeyman of the Times and other media, supposedly deep-sixing the campaign of the so-called straight-talking and liberal leaning John McCain

<>First the NYT tried to torpedo his candidacy by endorsing him. When that didn't work, they exposed him.

tic

+0 Rating
Scan_1_tinythumb

-

By mary vb on Feb 21, 2008 1:00 PM EST

I hope CNN asks Hillary why she won't release her tax returns. But I have a feeling that Obama will get all the tough questions. Also, watch for Hillary to try to land a real zinger against Obama.

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Joan* In*Florida on Feb 21, 2008 1:52 PM EST

22. (or whatever)

1:08 pm

They're impaled on the horns of a dilemma.

 

While I agree with what you wrote, the Republicans would have been in the same dilemma with or without this distraction. Now they will have a good excuse as to why they lost the general election -- they can blame it all on a female lobbyist.

+0 Rating
Dean_tinythumb

-

By Sitka on Feb 21, 2008 1:07 PM EST

BREAKING: SERBIAN PROTETERS BREAK INTO US EMBASSY AND SET IT ON FIRE

Bomb Serbia!

No wait....we already did. 

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Joan* In*Florida on Feb 21, 2008 1:58 PM EST

Fresh from my inbox: (The bold is my addition)

Joan --News broke yesterday that a few wealthy Clinton supporters are gearing up for a massive spending campaign to boost her chances in the big upcoming contests in Texas and Ohio on March 4th.The so-called "American Leadership Project" will take unlimited contributions from individuals and is organized the same way as the infamous Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.ABC News reports that this group is seeking 100 Clinton supporters to each give $100,000 to fund its $10 million effort to promote Senator Clinton and "contrast" her positions with Barack Obama's.That's the opposite of how politics should work, and the opposite of how Barack Obama has run this campaign.The same day this group's activity was revealed, we announced that nearly 1 million individual people have donated to this campaign.Stand up against politics-as-usual. Help reach the goal of 1 million donors calling out for change by encouraging a first-time donor to own a piece of this campaign.If you give as part of our matching program, you will double the gift of a new donor. You can even choose to exchange a note with them about why you are part of this movement.Make your matching donation now:https://donate.barackobama.com/promiseGroups like this are forbidden from working primarily for the purpose of electing or defeating a candidate.Yet here we have a committee that springs up on the eve of an election, promotes a specific candidate, and has no history or apparent purpose of lobbying specific issues outside the benefit to the candidate of these communications.This raises a number of legal and ethical issues, but more than anything it reveals an attitude towards politics as a game that is played to win at all costs.Americans are ready for change. We are tired of Swift Boat-style groups and smear campaigns.Help reach the unprecedented goal of a million voices calling for a new kind of politics and a new kind of leadership. Make a matching donation now:https://donate.barackobama.com/promise
 
+0 Rating
676t107993

-

By Tom Bearse on Feb 21, 2008 2:06 PM EST

Joan wrote "Now they will have a good excuse as to why they lost the general election -- they can blame it all on a female lobbyist."

They'll still have lost.  I'm less concerned about how they try to explain it.

+0 Rating
796t373

-

By Annilow on Feb 21, 2008 1:40 PM EST

Terrible news!

Wolves to be removed from species list
By MATTHEW BROWN, Associated Press Writer
56 minutes ago

The loss of federal protection allows the three states to move forward with plans allowing hunters to target the animals, possibly as soon as this fall.

Environmental groups said Thursday they will sue the federal government to keep the animal listed.

"The enduring hostility to wolves still exists," said Earthjustice attorney Doug Honnold, who is preparing the lawsuit. "We're going to have hundreds of wolves killed under state management. It's a sad day for our wolves."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080221/ap_o...

+0 Rating
Photo_124_tinythumb

-

By Monica Smith on Feb 21, 2008 1:46 PM EST

25.  Actually, I think Bush One said it best when he said Hillary has experience with the "klieg lights" which sounded just a like a cock-roach reacting to a flash-light in the kitchen at midnight.

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Joan* In*Florida on Feb 21, 2008 2:35 PM EST

13,

1:47 sitka

Only it wouldn't  have served the shameful purpose of deception to allow anyone to see it.

 

And deception in what Linda in NM subscribes to when posting truncated versions of Obama's words meant to purposedfully deceive. That fits the description of trolls. Scroll.

+0 Rating
Photo_124_tinythumb

-

By Monica Smith on Feb 21, 2008 1:50 PM EST

I've archived a picture of the plane on Hannah.  Just because covering over markings with a black plastic bag and duct tape seems a bit strange. 

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Pat in Colorado on Feb 21, 2008 2:39 PM EST

 

Phil, You've posted this several times.  Is this the piece you indicated you wanted to debate about Obama's stance of the global economy?  

Here's the start  of it.  It's posted again earlier in this thread.

"A strategy of doing nothing and letting globalization run its course won't result in the imminent collapse of the American economy."    ....   

I'm wondering if you think this is insufficient as far as policy goes.  As I recall his writing, he placed an emphasis on educating young people and retraining older people for skills and jobs in the global market place.  

I recall, isn't GM laying off another 17,000 workers in the next few months?  I don't think we'll ever return to the 50s, so in that sense partcularlyI agree with Obama's plan for education and training.

There's an excellent article on education in this week's Time Magazine on how to better prepared teachers.  There's merit pay, but it's not just testing.  The Denver Plan is various and teachers can choose it.  In all the plans mentioned, government and community have to invest in education.

I recall Seashell posting that Obama supports vouchers, but in the article, he clearly does not, though typical of him, he's willing to listen to various plans and investigate them.

What I think is his stance is that we have to educate our people for the 21st century, and that's not happening now.  

I don't know if this addresses the issue for you, but thought I'd attempt it anyway. 

+0 Rating
Democracy_tinythumb

-

By Karen on Feb 21, 2008 1:53 PM EST

"watch for Hillary to try to land a real zinger against Obama."

mary~ that's a given, but I've not seen Barack lose his cool yet. I suspect McCain's current antics might take a little away from this debate tonight. 

+0 Rating
796t373

-

By Annilow on Feb 21, 2008 1:53 PM EST

Defenders of Wildlife works hard on behalf of wolves. Send them some $ if so inclined:

http://www.defenders.org/index.php

and if you're short this month, please call and protest:

Take action. Please take a moment right now to call the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at 1-800-344-WILD (9453) and deliver this simple message:

“My name is [Your Name] and I’m calling from [Your City], [Your State]. I understand that the federal government is expected to remove wolves in the Greater Yellowstone and Central Idaho regions from the list of federally protected threatened and endangered species.

I want your department to know that I strongly oppose the weakening of protections for these wolves and expect you to fulfill your obligation to secure a lasting future in the Northern Rockies for these amazing animals.”

To expedite your call, please select option "3" for endangered species questions and comments when prompted to do so. If you cannot get through, you may also email your comments to the Fish and Wildlife Service at westerngraywolf@fws.gov.


+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Joan* In*Florida on Feb 21, 2008 2:44 PM EST

I find this to be hilarious  news:

Sen. Joe Lieberman defended Republican presidential candidate John McCain on Thursday, calling a New York Times story suggesting he favored a lobbyist's clients "outrageously unfair."

 

This story is pre 9-11, before Lieberman became interested in the Iraq war and siding with the Republicans. How is the world would Lieberman know anything at all about it. What a jerk! Probably good he isn't a Democrat these days.

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Feb 21, 2008 2:07 PM EST

Probably good he isn't a Democrat these days

~~~~~~~~~

probably???!!!!!

+0 Rating
796t373

-

By Annilow on Feb 21, 2008 2:11 PM EST

NG!!!! Why is it our fault? Is this a so called proxy war?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23277147/

Protesters break into U.S. embassy in Serbia
Support for Kosovo independence raised tensions with Balkan nation

BREAKING NEWS
NBC News and news services
updated 27 minutes ago
BELGRADE, Serbia - Protesters broke into the U.S. embassy in Belgrade on Thursday and set fires, cheered on by crowds outside rallying against U.S. support for Kosovo's independence.

Doors were ripped off, set on fire and wedged in the embassy windows. Black smoke billowed from the building. Papers and chairs were thrown out of the windows.

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By FRED from OR on Feb 21, 2008 2:15 PM EST

37.

Pat in Colorado
Thu, 02/21/08

...I recall Seashell posting that Obama supports vouchers, but in the article, he clearly does not, though typical of him, he's willing to listen to various plans and investigate them...

====================

The American People like the idea of vouchers. Just because the right likes it, and religious like it, doesn't mean it cannot be amenable to liberal, if we show some innovative thinking.

Nothing objectively wrong with a voucher system, per se, if there are standards and parameters established involving pay, benefits, and certifications. No reason why teachers working under voucher-supported schools cannot be in the unions.

Democrats and liberals need to define the terms of this issue rather than oppose it, and take action, or we'll run into the same eleventh-hour dilemmas of compromise we had with welfare reform (which never really got reformed, just got deformed and turned into a mandatory employment program)

+0 Rating
Pdxteach_tinythumb

-

By seashell on Feb 21, 2008 2:16 PM EST

Just a little something to help  BO supporters know their candidate better and more realistically.  The Clinton bashing going on is very sad and I suspect a bit of projection is at work.   If  your guy is so great, why do you have to keep pushing and selling him so hard?  Attraction, not promotion is the key, but with BO, it's all promotion.  People like me don't want to be inundated with salesmen trying to sell me something.  It's a turn-off.   But carry on.  Free speech 'n all. 

******************************* 

 BREAKING: Obama Says He Will Vote for NAFTA Expansion

Posted October 9, 2007 | 04:58 PM (EST)
Read More: Free Trade, Nafta, Obama, Breaking Politics News


"Obama said he would vote for a Peruvian trade agreement next week, in response to a question from a man in Londonderry, NH who called NAFTA and CAFTA a disaster for American workers. He said he supported the trade agreement with Peru because it contained the labor and environmental standards sought by groups like the AFL-CIO, despite the voter's protests to the contrary. He also affirmed his support for free trade."
 

The voter's "protests to the contrary" are exactly right. The AFL-CIO does not support the bill expanding NAFTA into Peru, and the much-trumpeted labor/environmental standards leave enforcement up to the Bush administration, rather than empowering third parties to enforce them (like corporations have the power to enforce investor rights provisions in these same trade agreements). Leaving enforcement to the Bush administration -- or any administration -- is the biggest loophole possible. It is precisely why corporate lobbyists have bragged to reporters that the standards are not enforceable.

Obama is the first presidential candidate to officially declare his/her support for the NAFTA expansion moving through the Congress. His announcement is not necessarily surprising, considering he was the keynote speaker at the launch of the Hamilton Project -- a Wall Street front group working to drive a wedge between Democrats and organized labor on globalization issues. His announcement comes just days after a Wall Street Journal poll found strong bipartisan opposition to lobbyist-written NAFTA-style trade policies.

Trade has been known to be a huge issue in Iowa (remember Dick Gephardt in 1988), so this announcement could very well ripple through the 2008 primary.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/breaking-obama-says-he-w_b_67780.html 

+0 Rating
Pdxteach_tinythumb

-

By seashell on Feb 21, 2008 2:21 PM EST

Fred, I posted an article about what BO said about vouchers.  I wasn't giving my opinion.  Watch how you misinterpret me, please.

 

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Pat in Colorado on Feb 21, 2008 3:13 PM EST

#38

The article in Time Magazine has some very creative programs.  My problem with vouchers is when they go to religious institutions.  I want that separation between church and state.  I, on the other, hand, think that schools could offer courses in religions, after school.  It's when the state sanctions a particular religion I have problems.  

I think regular courses in Eastern Philosophy, the Bible, the Koran, the Bagavad Gita, etc. are very legitimate as long as they don't proseltize.

I've wondered why we think secular education is enough for life.  Humans seek wisdom, seek meaning.  In the 70s values education was a no no, and then realistically, people recognized that we carry our values with us, and there's no way we don't demonstrate them in the classroom.  But, there are teachers who do proseltize, and I find that objectionable.  It's a discussion that's needed. 

 

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Pat in Colorado on Feb 21, 2008 3:13 PM EST

Sorry, Seashell.  You are right.  It was an article you posted.  My mistake to indicate otherwise.

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Feb 21, 2008 2:25 PM EST

yes Pat

McCain is so vulnerable to that Michigan quote "those jobs are never coming back" that I don't want to see the Democratic nominee fall into that trap

many of the jobs we lost to the Chinese "competitiveness" were because they were able to manipulate the price of their currency and undercut our products,(and it fit rght into the trick used by bushco to shuck trillions in obligations by letting the dollar fall along with the "bad" Chinese money)

what Barack Obama does in that quote is lay out masterfully an economic attack that would work against both Clinton and McCain, especially in Ohio but he is a little too timid in his solutions.

but on those pages is the kernal of a winning economic strategy

you can't find solutions until you have identified the problem

and does anyone still believe more "job retraining" solves the problem of those lost $20 plus an hour jobs with some service sector paying under $10 even if you index the minimum wage yearly for inflation when $10 is only worth $6 in real dollars and you have lost your healthcare your pension and the equity in your house

Obama is a bright guy so I expect him to lay out more of his economic plans in the days leading up to Ohio where a good answer will win him the nomination

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Pat in Colorado on Feb 21, 2008 3:18 PM EST

#39 Seashell,

This has come up before.  The Peru treaty essentially favors the US.  That was the reason Obama supported it.  Otherwise, the treaty with Nafta would remain the same.  

These are complex issues, and it's hard to draw a conclusion because someone on the Huffington Post or elsewhere writes an opinion piece.  There's no reason to think that Obama is out to hurt American workers.  Everything in his book and policies indicates he wants to help them.

 

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Feb 21, 2008 2:31 PM EST

vouchers and private schools started as an answer to court ordered desegregation

maybe Obama can be the "Nixon goes to China" on that issue as President

what they have done to the public schools of NOLA since Katrina is Republicans' true vision though

+0 Rating
Pdxteach_tinythumb

-

By seashell on Feb 21, 2008 2:31 PM EST

My question to BO tonight which won't be asked.

How can you honestly call yourself the anti-war candidate when you always vote to continue the spending to keep our troops in harms way?

If he'd come clean on this, I would like him a lot more.  He could say, "I'm not really the anti-war candidate."....or "I voted to go along to get along" ....something....anything...as it is, he's hedging his bets and poker players, good ones, are sly, manipulative, cunning, and hide their intentions and feelings behind their faces.  They bluff.

It's very helpful to know he's a  poker player.  I'm getting closer to what troubles me so about him.  He has, IMO, a *poker-face* candidacy - never really revealing much on the stump except to infer that he's holding a royal flush of hope and change.

Is he bluffing the populace?  Especially impressionable youth?  I dunno. 

 

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Pat in Colorado on Feb 21, 2008 3:21 PM EST

#41, yes, I seem to have read or watched a special, probably read that workers in Louisiana were retrained on computers, and then the computer jobs went overseas. 

I agree. There's got to be more than just retraining.  There should also be a boost for American businesses, and (I think Obama did address this) no more tax breaks for corporations going overseas.

Sounds to me like there needs to be a multi-faceted approach, and this is where an effective leader can bring in talent to create a solution. 

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By FRED from OR on Feb 21, 2008 2:33 PM EST

40.

seashell :-)
Thu, 02/21/08

Reply to this

Fred, I posted an article about what BO said about vouchers. I wasn't giving my opinion. Watch how you misinterpret me, please
=====================

Sorry, I haven't read Obama's quote, but would like to, if you give me a link, it would help.

I was just giving my opinion on the subject, which I have long held from the beginning, long before it was considered a "neocon" idea.

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Linda on Feb 21, 2008 2:37 PM EST

Sitka wrote: "A strategy of doing nothing and letting globalization run its course won't result in the imminent collapse of the American economy." .... "But over the long term doing nothing probably means an America very different from the one most of us grew up in. It will mean a nation more stratified economically and socially" ... "It will mean an America in which we continue to mortgage our assets to foreign leaders" .... "an America in which we underinvest in basic scientific research" ... "an America that's more politically polarized " ... "Worst of all it will mean fewer opportunities for younger Americans, a decline in the upward mobility that's been at the heart of this country's promise since it's founding." Barack Obama

Compare that to this piece of trash editing posted by LindaNM yesterday........
2. Linda in NM -- Obama, "I believe in Free Trade"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTfJmz3GW...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's what Obama said in the video, which is from NH.....

"In one day we have a chance to restore balance to our economy. I believe in the free market. I believe in capitalism. I believe in free trade. I am not worried about us being able to compete with anyone in the world with American workers....."

Then the video cuts abruptly. From the inflections in his speech, it's obvious that his next word was, "But..."



________________________________


LOL...I appreciate being thought of that you want to keep reposting, but trying to link a video I posted with another comment Obama made, two totally different remarks is laughable.

But surprising that Joan in Florida buys that and calls me a troll for it.....me thinks someone needs some educating.

I recommend you look and hear and see for yourself. Poor Sitka is so tortured by these realities that Obama spoke, but are attacking Hillary for that he keeps on this this and is desperately trying to spin it.

Please note, Sitka posted the entire paragragph of his speech:

"In one day we have a chance to restore balance to our economy. I believe in the free market. I believe in capitalism. I believe in free trade. I am not worried about us being able to compete with anyone in the world with American workers."

This video was not a short with a cut off of "I believe in Free Trade".


But go ahead and name call, get trashy, smear. That seems to be all you all can do when someone delivers facts and news to you.

+0 Rating
T194148

-

By Jessica Falker on Feb 21, 2008 2:34 PM EST

Darrell!!! Email me! jjem1999 (at) yahoo.com

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Pat in Colorado on Feb 21, 2008 3:24 PM EST

#43, Come on Seashell, you don't like the guy at all for any reason. That's okay. 

No matter what the statements or evidence, you always find a way to say he's a phony, not legitimate, not honest, etc.  (My words.).  That's okay.  You don't have to like him, vote for him, or do anything at all.  But the constant criticisms and ignoring anything of merit is really just a waste of time for anyone to try to respond to. 

+0 Rating
796t373

-

By Annilow on Feb 21, 2008 2:36 PM EST

39.

seashell :-)
Thu, 02/21/08

Seashell, Sirota's article is from Oct 2007.

Here's something from Obama's fact check from Feb 16 of this year:
http://factcheck.barackobama.com/

FEBRUARY 16, 2008
The Clinton campaign is trying to push old, inaccur