Home » Blog » Jim Dean Responds to Rep. Jay Inslee's Impeachment Resolution...

Blog for America

Jim Dean Responds to Rep. Jay Inslee's Impeachment Resolution Against Gonzales

Written by: Sheri Divers on Aug 1, 2007 12:56 PM EDT

BURLINGTON, VT – Yesterday, Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA) introduced a resolution calling on the Judiciary Committee to consider impeachment proceedings against Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Jim Dean, Chair of Democracy for America (DFA), issued the following statement in response to the introduction of this impeachment resolution: 

"One thing is clear.  Alberto Gonzales is no longer fit to serve as the Attorney General of the United States.  If President Bush won't fire him, then Congress must exercise its constitutional authority and impeach the Attorney General.  Democracy for America supports today's resolution calling for the Judiciary Committee to investigate impeachment of the Attorney General.  Only after Gonzales is gone can integrity be restored to the Justice Department."

Democracy for America has been conducting a nationwide Impeach Gonzales campaign for the past 4 months. Our local groups delivered a petition signed by over 80,000 concerned Democracy for America members to the office of Rep. John Conyers, Chair of the House Judiciary Committee and several other pertinent committee members earlier this summer. This petition was a culmination of our Impeach Gonzales campaign including a two minute video Impeach Gonzales II: The Crimes and a series of prominent ads which ran in The Hill, the New York Observer, Detroit Metro Times and the Los Angeles Daily News. Both the film and the ads can be viewed online at www.impeachgonzales.org

Tags:

Discuss
 

Show: Expand All Reply

+0 Rating
Ed_rooney_tinythumb

-

By Michael Ellis on Aug 1, 2007 1:14 PM EDT

Oh no...........not first again..................oh well......................

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 1:20 PM EDT

Howard Dean is first.

+0 Rating
Photo_124_tinythumb

-

By Monica Smith on Aug 1, 2007 1:20 PM EDT

No, Dean is first. 

And our electric service is fixed.  

I'm thinking that maybe we should have a project where everyone throws their main breaker on their circuit panel and just uses the power for three hours a day, like they do in Baghdad. 

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 1:21 PM EDT

My Congressman Bruce Braley is on board the Impeachment train. Is yours?

+0 Rating
Crop_tinythumb

-

By Mz*Little on Aug 1, 2007 1:26 PM EDT

About time this happened.  AND, fortunately, Bush CANNOT pardon an impeachment.

BTW - Howie is first

+0 Rating
Crop_tinythumb

-

By Mz*Little on Aug 1, 2007 1:28 PM EDT

Insley IS mine!  Or close to me anyway.  McDermott is actually mine, but Insley's office is about 4 miles from my house and he attends our LD meetings regularly.  McDermott signed on to Kuchinichs' for impeaching Darth Cheney, so I'm fairly confident that he will sign on to this one as well.

+0 Rating
Crop_tinythumb

-

By Mz*Little on Aug 1, 2007 1:28 PM EDT

Back to the salt mines.  Has anyone notified the other thread?

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 1:29 PM EDT

one of the reasons to have sex given was "to be closer to God"

don't know about that, but hot buttered sweet corn that was in the field this morning works for me

the grower that hired the foxy young lady to sell his pickup load of corn had the lads lined up like they were going for a two-fer

who said marketing and religion couldn't mix?

+0 Rating
Pdxteach_tinythumb

-

By seashell on Aug 1, 2007 1:37 PM EDT

I also like Conyers and I wish he'd sign on with Kucinich.

FWI, I also post points of view that are not those of most of us. I

And I do admire what Japan is doing about transporation.

So when do impeachment proceedings against Cheney begin?

Obama has many young people supporting him.  What do they know or remember about nukes and the devastation they cause? Do they have a clue about Pakistan? I doubt it.  It's style over substance and the Obama campaign knows this is how to capture the naive youth vote; hence the offensive, IMO, Obama girls, who,IMO, are being exploited sexually.  Frankly I find him and his campaign manipulative, deceptive, sexually exploitive.  Between his views on the *war on terror,* Pakistan and  AIPAC, I find him downright scary.  And he's bright enuf to fool enuf people to get elected.

In the Kos poll, Clinton is leading  with Obama in second.

Is the fix in? 

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 1:34 PM EDT
More than 150,000 of our brave men and women are in a war zone, and Dick Cheney doesn't think Congress should know about how we are planning to bring them home.

Well I do, and I won't stop putting pressure on this administration until I know they have a plan to bring our troops home safely.

But it's not just that Cheney doesn't think Congress should have oversight -- he thinks those of us who do are "reinforcing enemy propaganda."

It is time to find out exactly where the Bush administration stands on this issue. I'm going to send a letter to President Bush, and I want your name to be on it. Join me in calling on him to plan for the safe withdrawal of our troops.

Here's the whole story. Back in May, concerned about the administration's failure to plan in Iraq, I sent a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates asking him to provide Congress with briefings of contingency plans for withdrawal -- or an explanation of why no such plans exist.

Two weeks ago, Under Secretary of Defense Eric Edelman responded in a letter that said discussing plans for withdrawal "reinforces enemy propaganda." It was an outrageous response -- and a dangerous one. Planning for withdrawal isn't just common sense. It is vital to ensuring our troops return home safe.

Secretary Gates quickly disavowed Edelman's letter, saying he encouraged Congressional oversight and promising to respond to my original inquiry.

But in an interview with Larry King that aired last night on CNN, Vice President Cheney said he agreed with Edelman's assertion that Congress asking the Pentagon to plan for our troops' safe return "reinforces enemy propaganda."

So which is it, President Bush? Do you support the safe return of troops from Iraq, or are you going to continue to play politics with their lives?

Let's ask him together:

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/iraq

I couldn't care less what Dick Cheney says about me. But when he plays politics with the lives of our troops, you had better be sure I'm going to respond. And I know that you want to respond too.

Thank you for joining me in calling on President Bush to plan for the safe return of our troops from Iraq, and for the support you show me every day.

Sincerely,
Hillary
Hillary Rodham Clinton
+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 1:35 PM EDT
+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 1:37 PM EDT
 This week we got the chance to see the final bill, and I am pleased to say I will proudly support this landmark legislation.
 
The final ethics bill, which has already passed the House, includes a strong lobbyist gift ban, tough new restrictions on privately funded travel and corporate jet flights, much needed additional disclosure of lobbying activities, unprecedented new disclosure of all of the ways that lobbyists provide financial support to members of Congress, including bundling campaign contributions, a provision to slow the revolving door between the halls of Congress and the lobbying world, and earmark reform.
 
This is an issue that I've worked on since first coming to the Senate in 1992.  And while I wish the final bill would have been even stronger, this legislation represents a dramatic change in the way business is done in Washington, D.C. 
 
Now there is much more work to do.  Congress still isn't moving as fast as either you or I would like on a number of issues - specifically on safely redeploying our brave men and women in uniform out of Iraq.  But passing this strong ethics reform package is a giant step toward getting our country back on track.
 
Sincerely,

Russ Feingold
United States Senator
Honorary Chair, Progressive Patriots Fund

P.S. - Congress must also deal with an administration run amuck.  I will be formally introducing my two censure resolutions - holding the President, Vice President, and administration accountable for their mishandling of the situation in Iraq and for their blatant disregard for the rule of law - later this week. However, I'm still making last minute changes and would welcome your feedback.  If you haven't done so already, please take a moment and send me your thoughts on this vitally important issue.  Thanks again for all that you do.


+0 Rating
Pdxteach_tinythumb

-

By seashell on Aug 1, 2007 1:41 PM EDT

I disagree with Jim when he says that  "Only after Gonzales is gone can integrity be restored to the Justice Department."

Does anyone really think that Cheney/Rove will vote for integrity?

Another pawn will somehow be put in place or perhaps there will be an *event* here at home...or  how about a recess appointment after Gonzo decides he needs to spend more time with his family?  Remember, they are running out the clock and doing it masterfully.

To restore integrity, we have to get rid of Cheney.  Period.  IMHO

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 1:39 PM EDT

Last week, the minimum wage rose for the first time in ten years, a real victory for the millions of Americans who struggle to make ends meet.

We have also produced other common-sense legislation that is popular across the political spectrum. Yet, despite the support of a clear majority of the American people, President Bush continues to oppose public sentiment and has even promised to veto these bills.

It's the same approach we have seen time and time again with this President, especially regarding his refusal to change course in Iraq.

I want you to rest assured that Democrats are listening to the American people, and we remain firm in our commitment to bring our troops home as soon and as safely as possible.

My fellow Democrats and I will continue to fight for what Americans need and care about. Our country faces great challenges, but with your support, I have no doubt that they are challenges we can overcome.

Sincerely,

Louise Slaughter

+0 Rating
676t107993

-

By Tom Bearse on Aug 1, 2007 1:43 PM EDT

seashell wrote "I also like Conyers and I wish he'd sign on with Kucinich."

He's already endorsed Obama.

+0 Rating
511t233735

-

By Huron John on Aug 1, 2007 1:48 PM EDT

seashell wrote "I also like Conyers and I wish he'd sign on with Kucinich."

He's already endorsed Obama.

Not too long ago, he was for Impeaching Bush and Cheney--so he's open to changing his mind!~

+0 Rating
N734823365_4437_tinythumb

-

By Susan Rowe on Aug 1, 2007 1:54 PM EDT

Thank you Jim Dean!


+0 Rating
357t234709

-

By * rdorgan on Aug 1, 2007 1:54 PM EDT
10.


Phil -

Thanks, already did.

Darn say, Obama is now leading.

 

+0 Rating
676t107993

-

By Tom Bearse on Aug 1, 2007 1:56 PM EDT

John wrote "Not too long ago, [Conyers] was for Impeaching Bush and Cheney--so he's open to changing his mind!~"

"For" or "open to" impeachment?  Has he changed his mind?

+0 Rating
357t234709

-

By * rdorgan on Aug 1, 2007 1:56 PM EDT

I'm supporting Obama and I'm 47 years old.

Does that make me young ?

+0 Rating
676t107993

-

By Tom Bearse on Aug 1, 2007 1:59 PM EDT

rdorgan wrote "I'm supporting Obama and I'm 47 years old. Does that make me young ?"

Phil would call you "Old Creaky."

+0 Rating
Pdxteach_tinythumb

-

By seashell on Aug 1, 2007 2:04 PM EDT

I won't sign anything sent out by Clinton.  I know I'm being very intractable.  Wait till I write in Gore or Green.....

+0 Rating
Pdxteach_tinythumb

-

By seashell on Aug 1, 2007 2:06 PM EDT

What?  Conyers endorsed Obama?  Did I forget that while remembering what happend on July 2 , 35 years ago?  LOL

Well isn't that interesting.   

+0 Rating
Pdxteach_tinythumb

-

By seashell on Aug 1, 2007 2:09 PM EDT

When will these people start listening to those of us way out in front?

Florida Voting Machines Can Be Hacked
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/080107J.shtml
Marc Caputo reports for The Miami Herald, "Reversing an unofficial policy of denial, the Florida Secretary of State's office has conducted an elections study that confirmed Tuesday what a maverick voting chief discovered nearly two years ago: Insider computer hackers can change votes without a trace on Diebold optical-scan machines."

 

+0 Rating
357t234709

-

By * rdorgan on Aug 1, 2007 2:07 PM EDT
21.


Tom -

Actually, I'm senior to Obama by one year (as are many other bloggers on the Obama '08 website).

Oh well, I'm starting to get too much gray for bothering with Just For Men hair touchups.

+0 Rating
357t234709

-

By * rdorgan on Aug 1, 2007 2:08 PM EDT

typo - I'm senior to Obama by one year (as are many other bloggers on the Obama '08 website).

s/b - I'm senior to Obama by one year (as are many other bloggers on the Obama '08 website senior to him too).

+0 Rating
Pdxteach_tinythumb

-

By seashell on Aug 1, 2007 2:13 PM EDT

* rdorgan

So I take it you're in favor of a terrorist nuclear state, Pakistan; and in favor of war w/o end and in favor of arming friends today who likely will be enemies tomorrow.

Less money and aid to Sierra Leone and your wife's family.

+0 Rating
Pdxteach_tinythumb

-

By seashell on Aug 1, 2007 2:17 PM EDT

I'm grumpy today and not liking the choice of voting for Sleazy, Dopey, Creepy, and the rest of the gang.

GORE! 

+0 Rating
357t234709

-

By * rdorgan on Aug 1, 2007 2:13 PM EDT

12. 

When Carter was running for president in 1976, a young Amy often traveled with him and Rosalyn on the campaign trail.

Ditto Bill Clinton with a young Chelsea and Hillary.

The kids looked like they were having fun as well as the spouses.

But hey, if some see that  as explotation, then all I can say is zounds - that's a whopper of a generalization and of a stretch of what that term exploitation (ie. "exploited sexually") means.

+0 Rating
Ed_rooney_tinythumb

-

By Michael Ellis on Aug 1, 2007 2:13 PM EDT

seashell :-)
Wed, 08/01/07
1:37 pm
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Obama can have all the young people he wants.........as long as he informs them that it is they who will be going to scenic Pakistan, Afghnistan, Iraq and probabaly Africa soon enough to do the fighting..............watch em scatter like bugs then

+0 Rating
676t107993

-

By Tom Bearse on Aug 1, 2007 2:25 PM EDT

Mike wrote "Obama can have all the young people he wants.........as long as he informs them that it is they who will be going to scenic Pakistan, Afghnistan, Iraq and probabaly Africa soon enough."

Is there a reason why he would be doing that?

+0 Rating
357t234709

-

By * rdorgan on Aug 1, 2007 2:27 PM EDT
27.


...

Less money and aid to Sierra Leone and your wife's family

...

Thanks for being concerned.

The U.S. doesn't currently give much aid at all to Sierra Leone or any other African country (excluding Egypt).  Great Britian, which has troops fighting in Afghanistan against al Qaeda and the Taliban, is the main supplier of aid to Sierra Leone.

The people of Sierra Leone have not forgotten what Britian did to help weed out terrorism in Sierra Leone (the terrorism of the RUF that hacked off civilians hands and feet) in 2000, by Tony Blair ordering in British commandos into the heart of the capital of Freetown, where the rebels had conquered half of the city. 

Seven years later, next week on 8/8/07, Sierra Leoneons, including many expatriates, will be voting in long lines for a president and a parliament.  My wife and I will be visiting there next Oct.

As for Obama, he's already indicated that he's interested in giving more aid and attention to his ancestorial homeland continent of Africa.

Finally, IMO we'll have a president who can walk and chew gum the same time (not choke on pretzels or pork rinds).

I already said that if Gore decides to enter the race for U.S. President, I will seriosuly have to make a decision if my support for Obama for president still stands as strongly as it does now.

But since Gore has not announced, for now I'm not on the fence and obviously haven't been since this past Jan when Obama announced. 

(FYI  - I don't want a repub, the likes of a Romney, as our next President, and will do whatever I can to ensure that.  I've already seen what he can do as my governor and IMO it was not a pretty sight.)

+0 Rating
796t373

-

By Annilow on Aug 1, 2007 2:36 PM EDT

Driving by (again) to tell you I wrote a musically oriented 'trip report' with pix at my blog http://www.annilow.blogspot.com and a travel oriented one at Frommer's travel talk http://www.frommers.com/cgi-bin/WebX?13@142.cjzmbParQeq^8@.ef3ced8 if there is any interest. This is about the trip I took last week to Verbier, Lake Como and Milan.

bbl

+0 Rating
796t373

-

By Annilow on Aug 1, 2007 2:39 PM EDT

33. one more try on the frommer's link
http://www.frommers.com/cgi-bin/WebX?13@142.cjzmbParQeq^8@.ef3ced8
or go to http://www.frommers.com and click as below:

Travel Talk
Europe
General Info & Multi-Country Travel

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By chuck nasmith on Aug 1, 2007 2:47 PM EDT

Obombabushlite/2008     joe is my mentor

+0 Rating
Ed_rooney_tinythumb

-

By Michael Ellis on Aug 1, 2007 3:02 PM EDT

Is there a reason why he would be doing that?

__________________________________________________________________________

Tom,

The young people of this coiuntry had better expand their boundaries of intelligence alot farther than ipods, razors, american idol and skateboards.............if candidates like obama want to rant on about war and conflicts then they had better figure out just who will do the fighting on these adventures................

They can start with reading a little foreign policy history first, and how this country got itself int the current mess that its in.............its not as simple as good guys and bad guys anymore..........

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 3:08 PM EDT
MONDAY, AUGUST 6, 2007
11:00 AM
Senator Edwards to deliver a major policy speech
IBEW Local 405
1211 Wiley Boulevard SW
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 3:09 PM EDT

Annilow

sounds like you had a good trip, and reading on down found a fellow Earth Wind and Fire fan

thanks for sharing

+0 Rating
357t234709

-

By * rdorgan on Aug 1, 2007 3:05 PM EDT

10.

Obama is now at 46 % in the dailyKos poll (Which Democrat will capture the nomination?)

I guess, that terrorism speech earlier today he gave must have really hurt him.

+0 Rating
357t234709

-

By * rdorgan on Aug 1, 2007 3:06 PM EDT

well, got to head out

bbl

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 3:13 PM EDT

 I hop on my bike this Saturday. This race raises money for cancer research and treatment. We've made great strides in those areas; I'm living proof of that -- but those we all know and love who weren't so lucky remind us we have more miles to go than there are miles in this race.

So, please, go here and support my ride with a pledge of support. Help raise money for this important cause.

The money raised will go to the Jimmy Fund. Anyone who grows up in New England knows all about the Jimmy Fund. As a New Englander, I still remember those photos in the newspaper and those ads between innings -- the images of our heroes Ted Williams and Yaz asking each of us to pitch in to help children struggling to beat cancer. There's a reason The Jimmy Fund sign is there on The Green Monster in Fenway Park, a fact which will be brought home to all of us in Red Sox Nation when Jon Lester pitches from the Fenway mound for the first time very soon on his own courageous comeback journey. This is an outstanding charity that has done decades of important work, and last year this race represented a full 50% of the income of the Jimmy Fund. So this is a very important event for a cornerstone organization in our fight against cancer.

Please help me support the Jimmy Fund.

Thank you,

John Kerry

+0 Rating
676t107993

-

By Tom Bearse on Aug 1, 2007 3:09 PM EDT

Mike wrote "if candidates like obama want to rant on about war and conflicts . . . "

You're being a little opaque.  Is this a reference to Obama's address on national security policy?

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By former on Aug 1, 2007 3:14 PM EDT

51.

* rdorgan
Wed, 08/01/07
11:59 am

confronting Al Qaeda - "early stages of a long struggle" - what to do about it ?:

http://www.barackobama.com/2007/08/01/th...

Remarks of Senator Obama: The War We Need to Win
Washington, DC | August 01, 2007
-------------

That's the true face of a "progressive" democrat..., lol.

Not surprisingly all this "tough talk" AFTER(!) recognizing "that in a new world of threats, we are no longer protected by our own power"!?

Contradictions seems natural to our Demos "professionals", (no wonder American people are confused when "professionals" are).

Contradictions are everywhere where there is no "common sense" (true even for Harvard graduate...), lol.

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 3:15 PM EDT

kossacks are in Chicago, pretty light poll test so far, mostly us bloggers over here?

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By former on Aug 1, 2007 3:17 PM EDT

Gravel/Kucinich-2008!

+0 Rating
Pdxteach_tinythumb

-

By seashell on Aug 1, 2007 3:19 PM EDT

Tell us something new, please

Bush Authorized Multiple Spying Programs
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/080107C.shtml
Dan Eggen of The Washington Post reports: "The Bush administration's chief intelligence official said yesterday that President Bush authorized a series of secret surveillance activities under a single executive order in late 2001. The disclosure makes clear that a controversial National Security Agency program was part of a much broader operation than the president previously described."

+0 Rating
Pdxteach_tinythumb

-

By seashell on Aug 1, 2007 3:21 PM EDT

War without end means soldiers w/o end; unless Obama/clinton are going to raid the prisons and pay mercenaries from all over the world and then charge us taxpayers, which I suspect is the plan.  A draft would have this country impeaching them.  But then, with all that unitary power, who cares what we think?

+0 Rating
Pdxteach_tinythumb

-

By seashell on Aug 1, 2007 3:24 PM EDT

Where are the Kos poll  numbers?  It's such a huge site I can't find the poll.

bbl 

+0 Rating
T2t4d_tinythumb

-

By Thankful2Thankful4Dean on Aug 1, 2007 3:27 PM EDT
+0 Rating
Photo_124_tinythumb

-

By Monica Smith on Aug 1, 2007 3:33 PM EDT

KOS is not responding.  Server problem.

+0 Rating
T2t4d_tinythumb

-

By Thankful2Thankful4Dean on Aug 1, 2007 3:38 PM EDT

Kos site says, 'we'll be right back'

YK starts tomorrow

aha - it's back...

Joe Biden 2% 4 votes

Hillary Clinton 23% 44 votes

Chris Dodd 1% 2 votes

John Edwards 15% 29 votes

Mike Gravel 3% 7 votes

Dennis Kucinich 3% 7 votes

Barack Obama 48% 89 votes

Bill Richardson 1% 3 votes

185 votes

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By roger rankin on Aug 1, 2007 3:43 PM EDT

3657

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By former on Aug 1, 2007 3:45 PM EDT

47.

seashell :-)
Wed, 08/01/07
3:21 pm


War without end means soldiers w/o end; unless Obama/clinton are going to raid the prisons and pay mercenaries from all over the world and then charge us taxpayers, which I suspect is the plan.
-----------
!!!
"...is the plan" and WAS from the very beginning of this "terror" (on American people) war.

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Joan* In*Florida on Aug 1, 2007 3:49 PM EDT

The Anti-Choice bodies never fail to cease upon an opportunity to get their foot in the door.

The Politics of Stillbirth

A new movement seeks to award special certificates to fetuses that are stillborn, but pro-choice advocates worry that this is yet another step toward fetal personhood that could endanger abortion rights.

http://www.alternet.org/rights/58198/

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By Joan* In*Florida on Aug 1, 2007 3:51 PM EDT

I don't know if my congressperson supports impeaching Gonzales. Corinne Brown doesn't answer many emails as she keeps her clerks to a minimum. She will however return phone calls.

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 4:22 PM EDT

OK pretend it is an Iowa caucus. That means only three are viable. where do those now for others but Edwards Clinton or Obama go? second choice matters in the modified IRV system

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 4:26 PM EDT

http://www.couragecampaign.org/SecureElections

Remember Ohio in 2004?  Or Florida in 2000?  If not for a hanging chad or hackable machine, would Al Gore be president now?  Or John Kerry?  Californians face a February primary that can decide who will be the nominee for each party.  And then a set of elections in June that will decide who figures out our budget in Sacramento and maybe even who can and can't get married.  And then in November we’ll decide, along with other states, who will be President.

Demand secure elections!

Support grassroots champion Debra Bowen's plan.  Join our friends across the state who have led on this issue.  Make every vote count.

Thanks for all you do!

Rick Jacobs
Chair
Courage Campaign

+0 Rating
Sharon_christmas_angel_119_tinythumb

-

By Phil Specht on Aug 1, 2007 4:27 PM EDT

Visit Wellstone Action's new Video Resource Library!

Click here

 

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By FRED from OR on Aug 1, 2007 4:30 PM EDT
BIDEN/LUGAR RESOLUTION CALLING FOR IMMEDIATE DEPLOYMENT OF UN PEACEKEEPERS TO DARFUR UNANIMOUSLY PASSES SENATE

Published: 08/01/2007

Passage Follows U.N. Security Council Decision to Authorize Peacekeeping Troops in Darfur

Washington, DC – Last night, just hours after the U.N. Security Council announced its decision to authorize the deployment of peacekeeping troops to Darfur, the Senate passed a bipartisan resolution (S. Res. 276) sponsored by Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Joseph R. Biden, Jr. (D-DE) and Ranking Member Senator Richard Lugar (R-IN) which calls for the immediate deployment of a peacekeeping mission to Darfur and lays out benchmarks for that mission

http://www.joebiden.com/newscenter/pressreleases?id=0132

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By audrey.nc on Aug 1, 2007 4:38 PM EDT


The poll is not for who you WANT to win, it's for who you THINK will win. Deceiving, don't know why they did it.

Just saw "SICKO" with 75 other Dems.

What I wanna know is, how do we get our government to be afraid of us, instead of the other way around.

Other countries get out into the streets, and their gov'ts fear them. For some reason Americans think that isn't "nice". I wonder why that is, brainwashed, stupid, afraid, lazy, they don't know which street?

The things we're doing aren't working too well, so we keep doing them, and we expect a different result?

+0 Rating
Default_user

-

By linda b on Aug 1, 2007 4:44 PM EDT

WOW THIS IS GREAT...

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF VIRGINIA HAS A NEW SITE UP WITH ALL THE WACKO PEOPLE RUNNING FOR THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY.

AND THE LADY, ER WACKO RUNNING AGAINST OUR JOHN MILLER IS ON THE SITE.

CHECK THIS OUT.

Democratic Party of Virginia

Dear Linda,

Do you remember the George Allen "macaca" video?

That piece of coverage played an instrumental role in the election of Senator Jim Webb-- and winning back the United States Senate last year. But that turning point in Senator Webb's campaign would not have been possible without his dedicated staff members following George Allen's every move.

That's the kind of work we're doing here at the Democratic Party of Virginia. As the Research Director, I'm working to build a Party apparatus that can immediately respond to the missteps and lies told by the Republicans who are trying to maintain control of the General Assembly.

Today, we launched a new website dedicated to shining a spotlight on just how far out of touch Republicans are in this state. TheyDontGetVA.com is a new project for tracking the often strange, sometimes corrupt behavior of Vi